IIS Repository

“Isms” in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism

Talja, Sanna and Tuominen, Kimmo and Savolainen, Reijo (2005) “Isms” in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61 (1). pp. 79-101.

[img]PDF - Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
131Kb

Abstract

Purpose – Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach – Presents a literature-based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings – Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value – Outlines each metatheory’s specific fields of application. Keywords - Philosophy, Information science, Libraries Paper type - Conceptual paper

Item Type:Article
Subjects:Library and Information Science > Library Science. Information Science
ID Code:33
Deposited By:David Pimentel
Deposited On:15 Apr 2007 10:59
Last Modified:15 Apr 2007 10:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page